Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1000513 DEA: 020J8504 EFIS: 0219000168
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-89-21/R34.622
Work Description: MCCLOUD CAPM - PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Location Description: IN SISKIYOU COUNTY AT AND NEAR MCCLOUD FROM 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF MUD CREEK BRIDGE TO ROUTE 5
Contractor Name: TULLIS, INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Austin Henry Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-25-104
TL Number from the TL Form: 876974
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 06/25/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/24/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750 Tons
A brief description of the sample: 2 Boxes of Lime Treated 3/4-inch Type A HMA (eq. PG 64-16)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80248
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis Inc. - Northstate Asphalt (Redding CA)
HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 4.7
Virgin binder PG: PG 58-22
Design binder PG: PG 64-16
Binder Supplier: Albina (Klamath Falls, OR)
RAP content (%): 25
WMA Additives: No
Antistrip type: 1.0% Lime
DIME Test ID: 2026-06-25-104-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 07/14/2026
Date Tested: 07/06/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb=4.60%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3046.5 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
5085.5 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
2039 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
4.6 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
108.6 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1930.4 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
0.58 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.15 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
5.38 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2026-06-25-104-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/14/2026
Date Tested: 07/07/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
1.6 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
1.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
1.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
1.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
92 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
70 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
41 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
28 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
20 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
15 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
11 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
9 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
6.7 %
|
