Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-06-24-65

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1000513 DEA: 020J8504 EFIS: 0219000168 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-89-21/R34.622
Work Description: MCCLOUD CAPM - PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Location Description: IN SISKIYOU COUNTY AT AND NEAR MCCLOUD FROM 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF MUD CREEK BRIDGE TO ROUTE 5
Contractor Name: TULLIS, INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Austin Henry Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-24-65
TL Number from the TL Form: 877800
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 06/24/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/24/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750 Tons
A brief description of the sample: 2 Boxes of Lime Treated 3/4-inch Type A HMA (eq. PG 64-16)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80244
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis Inc. - Northstate Asphalt (Redding CA)

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 4.7
Virgin binder PG: PG 58-22
Design binder PG: PG 64-16
Binder Supplier: Albina (Klamath Falls, OR)
RAP content (%): 25
WMA Additives: No
Antistrip type: 1.0% Lime
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-24-65-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 07/14/2026
Date Tested: 07/06/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb=4.66%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3047.9 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 5182.8 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2134.9 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.66 %
Mass Loss 114.9 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 2020 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.58 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.14 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-24-65-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/14/2026
Date Tested: 07/07/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 1.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) 1.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) 1.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) 1.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) 0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) 0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.4 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 91 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 68 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 42 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 29 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 21 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 15 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 11 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 6.9 %