Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1001153 DEA: 081L3104 EFIS: 0820000020
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 08-RIV-74-11.8/17.3
Work Description: RHMA (GAP GRADED), REPLACE AC SURF, AND COLD PLANE AC PVMT.
Location Description: RIVERSIDE COUNTY IN LAKE ELSINORE FROM GRAND AVENUE TO ROUTE 15/74 SEPARATION
Contractor Name: R.J. NOBLE COMPANY
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Xavier Avila Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2026-04-09-66
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: 9512323690
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 04/09/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 04/13/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 119.19 Tons @ 21:08
A brief description of the sample: RHMA-G SP 1/2"
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: 0189G-26
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: R.J. Noble Co. — Corona
DIME Test ID: 2026-04-09-66-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/14/2026
Date Tested: 04/16/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D08 - Fontana Field Testing Laboratory
Organization Address: 13970 Victoria Street,
Organization City: Fontana
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 92336
Organization Email: prakash.gowda@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (951) 232-3690
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.9 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
0.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
0.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
0.5 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
0.5 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
96 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
82 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
40 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
20 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
10 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
7 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
5 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
4.3 %
|