Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-05-20-116

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1000513 DEA: 020J8504 EFIS: 0219000168 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-89-21/R34.622
Work Description: MCCLOUD CAPM - PAVEMENT REHABILITATION
Location Description: IN SISKIYOU COUNTY AT AND NEAR MCCLOUD FROM 0.1 MILE SOUTH OF MUD CREEK BRIDGE TO ROUTE 5
Contractor Name: TULLIS, INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Austin Henry Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-05-20-116
TL Number from the TL Form: 877624
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 05/20/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 06/01/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 750 Tons
A brief description of the sample: 1 box of Lime Treated 1/2-inch Type A HMA (eq. PG 64-16)
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80213
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis — Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA)

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 1/2 inch
Lot number: 1
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number: 2603001
Binder content (%): 5.2
Virgin binder PG: PG 58-22
Design binder PG: PG 64-16
Binder Supplier: Albina (Klamath Falls, OR)
RAP content (%): 25
WMA Additives: No
Antistrip type: Lime
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-05-20-116-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 07/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/01/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb=5.41%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3047 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 4685.7 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1638.7 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 5.41 %
Mass Loss 101.4 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1537.3 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.59 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.19 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-05-20-116-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 07/03/2026
Date Tested: 07/02/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -2.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) 2.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -2.5 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -1.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -1.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -1.4 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -1.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -1.2 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 91 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 83 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 50 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 32 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 22 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 6.9 %