Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2026-06-22-42

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 1000014 DEA: 010H1504 EFIS: 0117000116 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 01-MEN-162-R0.0/25.7
Work Description: HMA, RHMA, AND GEOSYNTHETIC PAVEMENT INTERLAYER.
Location Description: MENDOCINO COUNTY NEAR LONGVALE FROM ROUTE 101 TO 1.1 MILES SOUTH OF POONKINNEY ROAD NEAR COVELO
Contractor Name: GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Steve Tisell Structure Rep.: Unknown

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2026-06-22-42
TL Number from the TL Form:
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT HQ - Sacramento Asphalt Binder Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (916) 227-7302
Type of Sample: Quality Assurance
Type of Material: Asphaltic Emulsion
Sample Taken Date: 06/22/2026
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 07/01/2026
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 1 jug
A brief description of the sample: SS1H
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification:
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Pacific Northwest

Material Information

Emulsion Grade: SS-1h
Lot Number:
Sub Lot:
Dilution Percentage Rate: 100% pure

Test Results

Test

DIME Test ID: 2026-06-22-42-1
Test Method: AASHTO T59-25: Standard Method of Test for Emulsified Asphalts (Emulsified Asphalt Residue Evap. (Sec. 7))
Verified Date: 07/02/2026
Date Tested: 07/02/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT HQ - Sacramento Asphalt Binder Laboratory
Organization Address: 5900 Folsom Boulevard,
Organization City: Sacramento
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 95819
Organization Email: guadalupe.magana@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (530) 713-6823
General Comments for this Test: evap
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
How many beakers will be used to conduct the test? 2
Beaker 1 Residue 59.2 %
Beaker 2 Residue 59.4 %
Percentage of residue 59 %