Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2025-12-17-46

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 994859 DEA: 021H5904 EFIS: 0216000025 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-SIS-96-43.5,57.0
Work Description: REPLACE CULVERTS WITH BRIDGES, STREAMBED RESTORATION, & LANDSCAPING.
Location Description: SISKIYOU COUNTY AT AND NEAR HAPPY CAMP AT 0.8 MILE WEST OF GORDON\\\\'S FERRY ROAD AND AT PORTUGUESE CREEK
Contractor Name: J.F. SHEA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Contractor Address: 17400 CLEAR CREEK ROAD, REDDING, CA 96001
Resident Engineer: Nicholas Riddle Structure Rep.: Nicolas Jimenez

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2025-12-17-46
TL Number from the TL Form: 877609
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Informational
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 12/17/2025
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 12/18/2025
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 18 Cores of Lime Treated 1/2-inch Type A HMA (PG 64-28M) Valero - Benicia
A brief description of the sample: 18 6-inch Cores
From where was the sample collected: Job Site
Laboratory sample identification: D81032
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Mercer-Fraser Company, Willow Creek Plant, Willow Creek, CA

Material Information

HMA Type: Type A HMA
HMA Grading: 1/2 inch
Lot number:
Sublot number:
HMA Mix Number:
Binder content (%): 4.9
Virgin binder PG: PG 64-28M
Design binder PG: PG 64-28M
Binder Supplier: Valero (Benicia, CA)
RAP content (%): 0
WMA Additives: No
Antistrip type: 1.0% Lime
Test results on following page(s): 2

Test Results

Test 1 of 2

DIME Test ID: 2025-12-17-46-1
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 01/15/2026
Date Tested: 01/13/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb=3.99%, TV=4.90. For Information Only
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3032.9 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 4576.4 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1543.5 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 3.99 %
Mass Loss 72.1 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1471.4 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 0.49 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.19 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 2 of 2

DIME Test ID: 2025-12-17-46-2
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 01/15/2026
Date Tested: 01/14/2026
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: For Information Only.
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) 0.6 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -0.3 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 82 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 51 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 32 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 23 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 16 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 9 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 6.9 %