Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 994539 DEA: 021H58U4 EFIS: 0223000059
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-PLU-70-58.2/R78.4
Work Description: RECONSTRUCT ROADWAY, HMA PAVING, DRAINAGE AND ELECTRICAL WORK.
Location Description: PLUMAS COUNTY AT AND NEAR CROMBERG FROM GILL RANCH ROAD TO 0.2 MILE WEST OF BIG GRIZZLY CREEK BRIDGE
Contractor Name: MERCER-FRASER COMPANY
Contractor Address: PO Box 1006, Eureka, CA 95502
Resident Engineer: Mike Zdenek Structure Rep.: Brandon Thurber
DIME Sample ID: 2025-11-06-75
TL Number from the TL Form: 875197
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Acceptance
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 11/06/2025
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 11/10/2025
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 850
A brief description of the sample: 1 Bag RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80123B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Western NV Materials, Spanish Springs
DIME Test ID: 2025-11-06-75-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 12/01/2025
Date Tested: 11/14/2025
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.514
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7331 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1620.9 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8307.2 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.514
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2506.7 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2025-11-06-75-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/01/2025
Date Tested: 11/24/2025
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb(uncorrected)=5.19%, Pb=5.01%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3156.4 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4774.9 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1618.5 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.19 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
87.1 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1531.4 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.19 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2025-11-06-75-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 12/01/2025
Date Tested: 11/25/2025
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-1.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
2.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.4 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
0.9 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
96 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
63 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
40 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
29 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
23 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
18 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
10.3 %
|