Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 1000957 DEA: 022K5404 EFIS: 0225000091
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02---
Work Description:
Location Description:
Contractor Name: TULLIS INC
Contractor Address: P O BOX 493416, REDDING CA 96049
Resident Engineer: Daniel Gibbs Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2025-10-10-31
TL Number from the TL Form: 876965
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 10/10/2025
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 10/10/2025
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: Production Start-Up Evaluation
A brief description of the sample: 2 Bags RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D80082B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis — Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA) — Latona Aggregates (Anderson, CA)
DIME Test ID: 2025-10-10-31-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 10/22/2025
Date Tested: 10/15/2025
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmm=2.571
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7331 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1647.3 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8337.5 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.571
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2563.5 kg/m^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2025-10-10-31-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 10/22/2025
Date Tested: 10/16/2025
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pb (uncorrected)=5.47%
Pb≈4.11%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3018.3 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4643.5 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1625.2 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
5.47 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
91.9 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1533.3 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.18 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2025-10-10-31-3
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 10/22/2025
Date Tested: 10/20/2025
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
-1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.9 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
-1.2 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.8 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.6 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
99 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
90 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
74 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
49 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
35 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
25 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
17 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
10 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
7.7 %
|
