Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 993184 DEA: 040A7724 EFIS: 0420000288 COOP: 0422825
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 04-ALA-80-6.4/6.8
Work Description: Excavation, HMA, structural concrete, minor concrete and drainage.
Location Description: IN BERKELEY AND ALBANY FROM 0.6 MILE NORTH OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE OVERCROSSING TO 0.3 MILE SOUTH OF EL CERRITO SEPARATION AND OVERHEAD
Contractor Name: OC Jones (Will Dieterich)
Contractor Address: 1520 Fourth Street, Berkeley, CA 94710
Resident Engineer: Gary Tsigelman Structure Rep.: Eric Urementa
DIME Sample ID: 2024-11-19-34
TL Number from the TL Form: 290-1119-1
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (510) 231-7151
Type of Sample: Quality Assurance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 11/19/2024
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 11/20/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 32 Boxes of HMA
A brief description of the sample: 3/4 RHMA-G WMA
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification: Rich_24_158
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name: Hwy 80 Gillman ST
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Vulcan Lake Herman Drum Plant
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-22: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of Samples
|
2
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
US Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water 1
|
7378 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
2520.3 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8846.8 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with water 2
|
7378 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 2
|
2540.1 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 2
|
8859.3 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
77 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.397
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 2
|
2.399
|
|
Average Specific Gravity
|
2.398
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
149.3 lb/ft^3
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU Burn #1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
4555.9 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
6602.8 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
2046.9 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
7.47 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
197.2 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1849.7 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
1.98 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.18 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-3
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU Burn #2
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
4555.6 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
6603.7 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
2048.1 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
7.63 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
200.3 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1847.8 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
1.98 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.17 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-4
Test Method: AASHTO T275-07r12: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Paraffin-Coated Specimens (Bulk Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU Cores 2-1A, 2-1B
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Bulk Specific Gravity
|
2.23
|
|
Bulk Specific Gravity 2
|
2.265
|
|
Average Bulk Specific Gravity
|
2.248
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-5
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/22/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF #1
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
4564.9 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
6618.7 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
2053.8 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
9.51 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
198.8 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1855 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.17 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-6
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF #2 PSU
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
4574.2 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
6628.3 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
2054.1 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
9.46 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
197.8 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1856.3 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.17 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-7
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF Burn #1
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
99 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
88 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
77 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
36 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
19 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
12 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
5 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
3 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
2 %
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-8
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF Burn #2
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
No
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
98 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
87 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
76 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
40 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
22 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
13 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
8 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
5 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
3 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
1.6 %
|