Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2024-11-19-34

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 993184 DEA: 040A7724 EFIS: 0420000288 COOP: 0422825 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 04-ALA-80-6.4/6.8
Work Description: Excavation, HMA, structural concrete, minor concrete and drainage.
Location Description: IN BERKELEY AND ALBANY FROM 0.6 MILE NORTH OF UNIVERSITY AVENUE OVERCROSSING TO 0.3 MILE SOUTH OF EL CERRITO SEPARATION AND OVERHEAD
Contractor Name: OC Jones (Will Dieterich)
Contractor Address: 1520 Fourth Street, Berkeley, CA 94710
Resident Engineer: Gary Tsigelman Structure Rep.: Eric Urementa

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2024-11-19-34
TL Number from the TL Form: 290-1119-1
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (510) 231-7151
Type of Sample: Quality Assurance
Type of Material: Hot Mix Asphalt
Sample Taken Date: 11/19/2024
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 11/20/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 32 Boxes of HMA
A brief description of the sample: 3/4 RHMA-G WMA
From where was the sample collected: Source
Laboratory sample identification: Rich_24_158
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name: Hwy 80 Gillman ST
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Vulcan Lake Herman Drum Plant

Material Information

HMA Type: RHMA-G
HMA Grading: 3/4 inch
Lot number: 2
Sublot number: 1
HMA Mix Number: 226120D
Binder content (%):
Virgin binder PG:
Design binder PG:
Binder Supplier:
RAP content (%):
WMA Additives:
Antistrip type:

Test Results

Test 1 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-1
Test Method: AASHTO T209-22: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of Samples 2
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? US Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 1 7378 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 2520.3 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8846.8 grams
Mass of container filled with water 2 7378 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 2 2540.1 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 2 8859.3 grams
Temperature of Water 77 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.397
Specific Gravity for Sample 2 2.399
Average Specific Gravity 2.398
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 149.3 lb/ft^3

Test 2 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU Burn #1
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4555.9 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6602.8 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2046.9 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 7.47 %
Mass Loss 197.2 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1849.7 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 1.98 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.18 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 3 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-3
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU Burn #2
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4555.6 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6603.7 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2048.1 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 7.63 %
Mass Loss 200.3 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1847.8 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) 1.98 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.17 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 4 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-4
Test Method: AASHTO T275-07r12: Standard Method of Test for Bulk Specific Gravity (Gmb) of Compacted Asphalt Mixtures Using Paraffin-Coated Specimens (Bulk Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: PSU Cores 2-1A, 2-1B
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Bulk Specific Gravity 2.23
Bulk Specific Gravity 2 2.265
Average Bulk Specific Gravity 2.248

Test 5 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-5
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/22/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF #1
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4564.9 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6618.7 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2053.8 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 9.51 %
Mass Loss 198.8 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1855 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data0 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.17 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 6 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-6
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF #2 PSU
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 4574.2 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 6628.3 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 2054.1 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 9.46 %
Mass Loss 197.8 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1856.3 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data0 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.17 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 7 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-7
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF Burn #1
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 88 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 77 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 36 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 19 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 12 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 8 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 2 %

Test 8 of 8

DIME Test ID: 2024-11-19-34-8
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 12/19/2024
Date Tested: 11/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D04 - Richmond Field Laboratory
Organization Address: 3401 Regatta Boulevard,
Organization City: Richmond
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 94508
Organization Email: santiago.sequeira@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: (510) 385-7641
General Comments for this Test: CF Burn #2
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? No
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 98 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 87 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 76 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 40 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 22 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 13 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 8 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 5 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 3 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 1.6 %