Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.
Project ID: 995525 DEA: 024J8304 EFIS: 0223000078
QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-MOD-395-34.0/39.9
Work Description: LINVILLE CREEK OVERLAY - HMA OVERLAY, REPLACE ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING AND SHOULDER BACKING.
Location Description: MODOC COUNTY NEAR DAVIS CREEK FROM 0.4 MILE SOUTH OF JOSEPH CREEK ROAD TO 1.7 MILES SOUTH OF DAVIS CREEK ROAD
Contractor Name: HAT CREEK CONSTRUCTION & MATERIALS, INC.
Contractor Address: 24338 Hwy 89 N, Burney, CA 96013
Resident Engineer: Kyle Higgins Structure Rep.: Unknown
DIME Sample ID: 2024-09-09-83
TL Number from the TL Form: 858513
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 09/09/2024
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/10/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: 2 Bags
A brief description of the sample: RAP
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79713D
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Hat Creek Fitch Rd
RAP Source: Hat Creek Construction and Materials, Fitch Rd
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:
DIME Test ID: 2024-09-09-83-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/24/2024
Date Tested: 09/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Is an aggregate correction factor used?
|
Yes
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing)
|
1.3 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing)
|
1.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing)
|
0.6 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing)
|
0.7 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing)
|
0.6 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.1 %
|
|
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing)
|
-0.3 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve
|
100 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve
|
96 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve
|
68 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve
|
49 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve
|
37 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve
|
29 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve
|
21 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve
|
14 %
|
|
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve
|
10.3 %
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-09-09-83-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/24/2024
Date Tested: 09/20/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Pbr(uncorrected)=6.24%
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
What temperature unit is used?
|
Celsius
|
|
Test procedure used?
|
Method A
|
|
Mass of the specimen basket assembly
|
3112.1 g
|
|
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition
|
4901.1 g
|
|
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition
|
1789 g
|
|
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content
|
6.24 %
|
|
Mass Loss
|
114.6 g
|
|
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition
|
1674.4 g
|
|
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen)
|
no data0 %
|
|
Moisture Content
|
no data0 %
|
|
Temperature Compensation Factor
|
0.17 %
|
|
Test Temperature
|
538 C
|
DIME Test ID: 2024-09-09-83-3
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/24/2024
Date Tested: 09/24/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.499
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
|
Number of tests
|
1
|
|
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density?
|
SI Units
|
|
Mass Determination
|
Air
|
|
Method Performed
|
Mechanical Agitation - Method A
|
|
Mass of container filled with water
|
7332.3 grams
|
|
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1
|
1864 grams
|
|
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1
|
8450.5 grams
|
|
Temperature of Water
|
24 °F
|
|
Specific Gravity for Sample 1
|
2.499
|
|
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F)
|
2491.8 kg/m^3
|