Print Report | Back to Sample Detail

Sample Record for 2024-09-09-64

Note: Fields with no data or with a value of "Unknown" will not be displayed on the print out.

Project Information

Project ID: 993119 DEA: 021J7104 EFIS: 0220000120 QA Service Level: 1
DIST-CO-RTE-PM: 02-TRI-3-29.77/L30.88
Work Description: TRINITY 3 PAVEMENT AND DRAINAGE
Location Description: TRINITY COUNTY NEAR DOUGLAS CITY FROM READING CREEK BRIDGE TO ROUTE 299
Contractor Name: TULLIS, INC.
Contractor Address: Unknown
Resident Engineer: Unknown Structure Rep.: Joseph Porra

Sample Information

DIME Sample ID: 2024-09-09-64
TL Number from the TL Form: 848627
Sample Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Sample Organization Contact: (530) 225-3194
Type of Sample: Production Start-Up
Type of Material: Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement
Sample Taken Date: 09/09/2024
Date that the sample was received by the laboratory/organization performing the testing: 09/09/2024
The quantity of what the sample constitutes: PSE 2 bags
A brief description of the sample: RAP Sample
From where was the sample collected: Manufacturer
Laboratory sample identification: D79711B
Structure unique identifier:
Structure name:
The fabricator/manufacturer/facility name: Tullis — Northstate Asphalt (Redding, CA) — Latona Aggregates (Anderson, CA)

Material Information

RAP Source: Tullis, Northstate Asphalt, Redding, CA
Aggregate Size:
Aggregate Source:
RAP Stockpile:
Stockpile Size (tons):
Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Mix Number:

Test Results

Test 1 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2024-09-09-64-1
Test Method: AASHTO T30-19: Standard Method of Test for Mechanical Analysis of Extracted Aggregate (Mechanical Analysis)
Verified Date: 09/18/2024
Date Tested: 09/17/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test:
Test Result Compliance: not applicable
Additional Comments When Verified:
Is an aggregate correction factor used? Yes
Aggregate correction factor for the 2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/4 in. sieve (% passing) no data0 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 1/2 in. sieve (% passing) -0.1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the 3/8 in. sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #4 sieve (% passing) -1 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #8 sieve (% passing) -0.9 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #16 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #30 sieve (% passing) -1.2 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #50 sieve (% passing) -0.8 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #100 sieve (% passing) -0.7 %
Aggregate correction factor for the #200 sieve (% passing) -0.6 %
Cumulative percent passing the 2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 1/2 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1 in. sieve 100 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/4 in. sieve 99 %
Cumulative percent passing the 1/2 in. sieve 88 %
Cumulative percent passing the 3/8 in. sieve 73 %
Cumulative percent passing the #4 sieve 49 %
Cumulative percent passing the #8 sieve 36 %
Cumulative percent passing the #16 sieve 25 %
Cumulative percent passing the #30 sieve 17 %
Cumulative percent passing the #50 sieve 13 %
Cumulative percent passing the #100 sieve 10 %
Cumulative percent passing the #200 sieve 7.4 %

Test 2 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2024-09-09-64-2
Test Method: AASHTO T308-10: Standard Method of Test for Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method (Method A) (Asphalt Binder Content)
Verified Date: 09/19/2024
Date Tested: 09/13/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: PBR(Uncorrected)=4.66
Test Result Compliance: complies
Additional Comments When Verified:
What temperature unit is used? Celsius
Test procedure used? Method A
Mass of the specimen basket assembly 3112.2 g
Mass of the specimen and specimen basket assembly prior to ignition 4695.8 g
Mass of HMA Sample prior to ignition 1583.6 g
Corrected Asphalt Binder Content 4.66 %
Mass Loss 76.8 g
Mass of aggregate remaining after ignition 1506.8 g
Correction Factor (Percent by mass of HMA Specimen) no data0 %
Moisture Content no data0 %
Temperature Compensation Factor 0.19 %
Test Temperature 538 C

Test 3 of 3

DIME Test ID: 2024-09-09-64-3
Test Method: AASHTO T209-12: Standard Method of Test for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Asphalt Mixtures (Maximum Specific Gravity)
Verified Date: 09/19/2024
Date Tested: 09/11/2024
Submitted By Organization: CT D02 - Redding Northern Regional Laboratory
Organization Address: 1657 Riverside Drive,
Organization City: Redding
Organization State: CA
Organization Zipcode: 96001
Organization Email: ward.jenkins@dot.ca.gov
Organization Phone: 530-225-3194
General Comments for this Test: Gmmr=2.633
Test Result Compliance: does not comply
Additional Comments When Verified:
Number of tests 1
What is the unit of measurement for theoretical density? SI Units
Mass Determination Air
Method Performed Mechanical Agitation - Method A
Mass of container filled with water 7332.3 grams
Mass of oven-dry sample in air for Sample 1 1571.5 grams
Mass of container filled with the sample and water for Sample 1 8306.9 grams
Temperature of Water 24 °F
Specific Gravity for Sample 1 2.633
Theoretical maximum density at 25°C (77°F) 2625.4 kg/m^3